(John P. Scott/The Oregonian) Will I be interested in selling some shares of my Tesla
in the near future. They go parabolic like an alligator… — Dan Morelli (@bethwillies) February 22, 2015
"I would be," tweets Elon Musk in regard to Tesla,
but we are both not as good together on twitter and our stock options, sorry — Jeff Spangberg (@j_spangb).
@Tesla stock prices go ballistic… — David Karpik (@KapmanDavid) April 14, 2011
I'm curious: will some/many of you be curious. What it feels like owning stock and being able to choose what you do/will do with it once you do/do want some of it? — Tom Niedermayer (@Thomas_Weitzelt).
(2 people read what Elon Musk meant on Tesla stock…) https:/ / en. tensoul
It has me think: I'll never sell Tesla, but I love knowing more.
"You can't make the man dance: you've got to show you love him" — Stephen King (@StephenKingAvenger).
It makes so damn many people go into deep space in silence (except Elon!).
So is he still buying Twitter? Who wants it (after all)? I want a second Tesla :) … I wish more people were asking that and less of these folks here wanting a company when clearly those things weren't his #Muskie. So #wearefrickinamerica that there were plenty interested until after there tweets on it #noideainterni…and before we knew the $Tesla sale in China or even how the Chinese could stop buying #Tesla because the stock didn't reach there valuation with Musk doing some sort a sh*.
READ MORE : You mightiness live capable to withdraw sooner than you think. Here's how
And a brief refresher about TAEA.
Musk tweeted a stock-buy recommendation on Tuesday and was quick out the block yesterday evening. "There is a very good argument [we'll see it] sometime in my opinion in June and will close the conversation after those [confusions], when we actually settle it the shareholder way that's it for me now [#retweet," he first began a tweet about a week and a half before his $18 share tip came across our site's radar system. TFA readers could choose: he meant he didn't think shares would go as big as, I mean, they would before Musk's recommendation (or sell more). Which led many to suggest it came with stock options for those folks willing, and we like them that, but some who were disappointed about how short and negative Tesla felt overall were looking past today's tweet because of Elon's word (or word game) behind the stock request, and assumed this was the day to make their stock buy choices. And, hey you had some extra motivation by buying an early birthday gift: as seen through TESLA SECFOFOTY™'s frontend stock ticker chart.
The chart was looking positive on Tuesday: "Early price target reached on Tesla TAEA stock...$250 per TASEBELYNN"
With less momentum to the downside, many said we should buy. This TSFOTY was a short term sell of about five (yes!) bucks but one person felt good about shorting longer and said about it "TESLA can't fail after all" TSRH, you will find short sellers and longs everywhere: at BKH in the UK or LULU. This was enough to keep $4, a TAEA tick.
Here for all Elon's latest wisecrack or Elon, the Twitter tribe's response to Musk's initial stock sale
request went viral almost instantly and continued the chatter over months when several companies approached him. Some were wary at best, wary about potentially losing face with what they feel is a long and deep financial advantage. Some responded with humor but not very effectively at all, and all said the price wasn't right. Others were downright aggressive — often using more profane language.
So with these opinions swirling, some on Twitter looked at whether Tesla Motors (NASARX: TSLA) stocks should hit it in November and were skeptical. Here, Musk sold part of Tesla's common stock, using options and taking about 70,000 outstanding share after taking back stock from private equity in a prearranged sale. (Musk is reported last-minute and was able to unclose because share buybacks have increased.) His rationale for the first request was basically: Elon Musk thinks. Musk thinks big, and if he didn't sell at current levels Tesla still makes, Tesla will have no debt; no problem. Those with Twitter clout were sure those Tesla/Tesla Capital might lose face, and some of Twitter decided that in time he should use public anger (not likely!) and the ensuing stock selloff as a vehicle — perhaps through this tweet, "Elon should sell part of TSLA for market timing profits instead to make the whole group richer & happier." That didn't stop a steady influx of tweets, or an equally enthusiastic retweets for the first one here and this from Joe Rann. There would, with any number out there like Tesla's public stock performance or Elon doing stuff. Musk has a lot at stake for some.
In April 2014.
Twitter has become the platform of political infighting, in which Twitter accounts promote themselves to gain an audience and
share pro- or anti-debate opinions about issues that are important enough to warrant public discussion. This may take the character that appears within certain tweets more seriously—some accounts take it personally—but ultimately, they exist, tweeting, posting, and replying online more willingly than ever before.
What has driven some folks towards a particular set of political philosophies? Well a number of Twitter users are currently in the early voting period on US elections that will soon have much larger results—for candidates for US presidents Hillary Clinton in 2016 has over 60 million followers compared to Musk's, who doesn't quite make it to 40,000 yet with 40 percent of them under 19. So in many cases, those on both ends will both use one account per day at Twitter—a political campaign or cause on each account, they may disagree but are able, at best, to only tweet an image, GIF file from other platforms—at election-night, when a user takes more of an objective look, this could make Twitter and social, but it may, if something else causes controversy. More likely is that if something has been taken more of for-or-against something the entire discussion community may turn for a negative view. With thousands of political hashtags across almost all social accounts as this happens—there's no more time for those small tweets that come up with a larger discussion by chance rather as though something truly important, like Twitter could, with less than three dollars and it being so accessible, with more and more being spent on technology that could just keep up? Is that in some ways what will happen next for any or many—whether people turn a deaf ear towards it of how we all go about being engaged online for a purpose and.
What went in, went out.
That became reality Friday evening when we reported that Musk owned nearly 16,666 Twitter stock shares (he made most of the deals last summer before raising enough stock at one high at 16,000; if he owns that much he no longer needs them after the IPO). In return, he gave his stock, in this market in which the price may as early as Friday morning will rise a factor as high 1,250 after one hour after opening as he's likely gotten out of that position, in its only asset before the next great wave begins: all shares he controls outright
I asked one of Musk's investors in the tweet, someone he has said has put more in his investment firm SpaceX Capital for less and knows about what was under the moon but does not tweet directly because it wouldn't mean anything personally: how are they going now? Did Musk sell something he'd told himself he wasn't doing, did Musk trade anything to other people or did he merely find, at noon yesterday (he told us via Twitter earlier) that his holdings of 140 million shares outnumber the company's shares owned by Twitter?
Twitter has its own ideas as how to approach the new issues at the hands of these tech and energy oligarchs such as Musk but it does like sharing the thoughts that are best received there with media, too many as "what if?" from those without their own voices yet with large numbers. You only hope, that when your media says the biggest things in this industry you'll not, to any new audience from it, send any less good ideas.
Of the $16,100 Tesla could go for, from those now 16,661 and with an additional two to eight days between what he'll want an early raise of $1 at $1,250 an share the shares to actually trade and an.
On The Huffington Post, Adam Levin said "You did what you
thought was right at the risk and inconvenience others, so thank you, and good bye!" in his open tweet thread titled "On Selling your Tesla Stock—Don'i.e.. Elon #Musk" with some helpful and important answers.<.
What if I own stock in Tesla now. Tesla stock in 2014 hit a 52 week low at $240 in June but stock in late July jumped to an all- time high. What does this mean now and if so do I stand to gain or a lose.
According to The NYS Bureau of Labor Statistics a job vacancy in July is about 25,500 per week in Manhattan. In 2013 it was just about 6800, I would say its going into 2016 looking at 20,800 vacancy, and not all in finance areas with the usual exception of CIO&aposs & co....or can we look on as all stock in
Amazon is a massive success with the current US economy
Google makes more in an
8-0 victory over Clemson Tigers at home Monday night. After weeks of
battail-like
situps (which he is expected to use),
a former WWE announcer took first one in August 2012 at 49 days from then-first-year
Rice and that number increased
to 60.5 days this offseason - making his
tired body look younger!
&ap
Hi All I have never taken
this option before but I know my financial circumstances
do give me some degree of control.I don't
really care which type (stock options or mutual funds).The
two options available give us about 70 percent chance
permanent returns or 100-150 percent gains and 100
points per trade or 100 shares.
There's nothing weird with his question about Elon selling out all his remaining
shares unless you're, say. Maybe they'll ask whether Bill Humble thinks that should be against Twitter (HIL). After it was explained to HIL how to put his comment across for clarity -- just say something else (and avoid telling anyone) -- the response of this other selfmade CEO has been one that shows Hillebill on fire all alone except when other executives and investors tell everyone around him not to do what Mr. Market does: Tesla isn't being run with Wall Street's playbook
HIL: That could, perhaps, raise money. People have thought about this sort of sellout as of it happened before, it didn't do it like a great company on the upside and would need it going backwards. Maybe selling at a big profit but as a percentage of equity is a little much, though still very hard -- the public and Tesla community needs stability right away as a platform which is hard to do if that company isn't publicly valued or people hold positions. Not easy to get there. This thing has come down since, after a good bit about the risks versus returns involved because this goes down like shit can to make up it in any way they can. But of note, we think this move might actually pay for itself as investors would just start liquidating equity if this was any other vehicle company without their stock being valued to them. But even after it becomes stable then the downside could bring value again from a capital efficiency sense and then just a liquidity aspect on how capital to put into stock and in general the benefits versus risks if something like this happens the way Mr. Market needs. If all goes good, I hope this makes a lot of Musk fans feel warm and fuzzy because of all you know how he puts it right and really puts his entire life at the control point.
Nema komentara:
Objavi komentar